Unofficial OGRE specification.

Vladius · Post by **Vladius** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:58 pm

Ive started this specification to clarify OGRE to me and my co-workers. I hope U will find this book useful too.
http://www.tarasov.org/OGRE_unspec001.pdf
This is just a first little draft. Stay intouch with this thread for updates.

Post by **jacmoe** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:59 pm

Better add this to the Wiki!

martinw · Post by **martinw** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:02 pm

Looking good so far

I like the font size/type especially, it makes it easier to read/understand IMHO.

Chris Jones · Post by **Chris Jones** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:11 pm

looks cool, i just started reading it

my only complaint so far, is the use of "U", i know its explained there, but its wrong for 2 reasons
1, i dont think shortenings should be used in documents like this, as it just looks like youve done it over msn or something
2, if you are going to use "U", can you change it to "u", cos "U" everwhere doesnt look to nice, and is harder to read, also it will at least keep the grammer type of thing correct, rather than having random capitals in the middle of sentences

other than that, looks good

Vladius · Post by **Vladius** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 pm

Thank U for Ur response on unofficial OGRE specification. U wont be erased or decapitalized, however, Im very interested in grammar and language corrections. U are wellcome to send me corrections to boxforsr@inbox.ru. Thank U

Post by **jacmoe** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:20 pm

ExcELleNt TUtoRiaL U hAvE tHerE - dId U WikI iT yEt ?

joshcryer · Post by **joshcryer** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 8:05 pm

This is starting off very nicely, and I think you are well written (especially given that you don't seem to speak English natively), keep it up!

I think using "U" is a very odd quirk (saving two letters is not that significant), but since the rest of what you write is very coherent I can overlook it. But I'll still think you're kinda weird, hehe.

In any case, it's starting off very good, so keep it up!