Do they deserve that...?

[spacegaier]

Am I the only one thinking that the yellow color is disturbing and sending a wrong signal? I think spammer/deactivated user don't deserve a shiny yellow username, but instead something like gray (showing that they are disabled), if they need a different color at all.

What do you think? Should I actually be the only one thinking that

[jacmoe]

We already decided that.
So just live with it.

[betajaen]

If I remember; it was down to yellow or pink. As the other colours were unsuitable or similar to existing group colours. Pink is too girly, so we went with yellow.

[koirat]

I would use transparent.
Why would they need name anyway.

[jacmoe]

They would need a name to make us see them..
Since we almost always delete their posts anyway - unless in border cases - you won't even notice that they're there.

[mkultra333]

I know this is wrong, but I enjoy reading the spam to see how lame it is. My favorites were the ones where they posted pet pictures. So I didn't mind the colourized names, made it easier to get my morning laugh.

[Kojack]

When the web goes HDR we could make them negative colours...

[koirat]

I know this is wrong, but I enjoy reading the spam to see how lame it is. My favorites were the ones where they posted pet pictures. So I didn't mind the colourized names, made it easier to get my morning laugh.

Spam can be fun. Until it's made with markov-chains.

[Thieum]

too bad you did not chose pink
this forum really lacks pink (and unicorns, but spammers would not deserve to have unicorns next to their usernames)

[reptor]

So is this the "rant about spammers here" thread?


IF CUKIOGN HATE THEM! GET THE fKUC OF THIS FORUM! i WILL ENVER BBUY ANYTHING FROM YOU OR YOUR MASTERS!



There. Now I feel better.

[jacmoe]

=)

[ryancall]

You anyway delete their accounts so the color doesn't matter after all. I don't like spammers either but I can get used to them

[jacmoe]

Good idea, Ryan.