Dream SSD machine

A place for Ogre users to discuss non-Ogre subjects with friends from the community.
Post Reply
User avatar
steven
Gnoll
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Australia - Canberra (ex - Switzerland - Geneva)
Contact:

Dream SSD machine

Post by steven »

I want that machine - and the video is pretty cool :D

(If you are poor don't look you will cry)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs


.
User avatar
Kojack
OGRE Moderator
OGRE Moderator
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
x 538

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by Kojack »

Same case as I used to have (except I had the black steel version). :)
With some customisation I could fit all those 24 in my new Lian Li case. It's got 15 drive bays and I could mount another 8 drives or more if I made some custom brackets.

It's not exactly cost effective yet. All 256GB ssd drives available in australia are around the $1000au range, compared to $155 for a 1TB hard drive. So that computer has $24,000 worth of ssds attached. They are about 25x more expensive per gig than a hard drive, but only 3.72x faster (1 vs 1, not raid).
User avatar
_tommo_
Gnoll
Posts: 677
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:09 pm
x 5
Contact:

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by _tommo_ »

A storage is nearly faster than the RAM :lol:
And it has also the bottleneck of PCIex8x...

But while memory becomes cheaper, energy doesn't... and that thing sucks 2000W :roll:
OverMindGames Blog
IndieVault.it: Il nuovo portale italiano su Game Dev & Indie Games
User avatar
Kojack
OGRE Moderator
OGRE Moderator
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
x 538

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by Kojack »

But while memory becomes cheaper, energy doesn't... and that thing sucks 2000W
But the ssd drives only use 1.5W each according to the samsung specs, so 36W for the drives and 1964W for the rest. :)
User avatar
Kentamanos
Minaton
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by Kentamanos »

Yeah, I think the power supply portion of the build was a total overkill.
User avatar
Kencho
OGRE Retired Moderator
OGRE Retired Moderator
Posts: 4011
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:28 pm
Location: Burgos, Spain
x 2
Contact:

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by Kencho »

Agree. Still an awesome config. Look at that taskbar. My XP config used to cry if I tried to do that, and obviously the processor was so overloaded that I had to wait till the end to start closing windows. And 0.8 secs to rip a DVD? It takes longer to fall from a 2nd floor! :lol:

That computer is too expensive for sure, but those who can afford it would be really happy. Once the SSD technology becomes cheaper, data processing computers will be happy :)
Image
User avatar
madmarx
OGRE Expert User
OGRE Expert User
Posts: 1671
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:26 pm
x 51

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by madmarx »

I ask my network administrator. He told me that the ssd average living time is very short compared to traditionnal hdd.
5000 access is not enough. So it is really a dream machine :lol:.
Tutorials + Ogre searchable API + more for Ogre1.7 : http://sourceforge.net/projects/so3dtools/
Corresponding thread : http://www.ogre3d.org/forums/viewtopic. ... 93&start=0
User avatar
_tommo_
Gnoll
Posts: 677
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:09 pm
x 5
Contact:

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by _tommo_ »

I read that a recent SLC SSD can do as much as 100.000 reads per cell, wich are of course levelled... so that it can work for 5-7 years like normal HDs, and they are improving fast.

It's true that 2000W was overkill, maybe they did it to have enough power lines?
And they weren't too sure of the overall stability, given the fire extinguisher :lol:

Anywyay i think that things like this expose how much CPU improvement are useless today...
with the same CPU, but exponentially better HD, performances are incredible... Core2+SSD >> i7+HD?
Who could need then to buy a better CPU for everyday use?
OverMindGames Blog
IndieVault.it: Il nuovo portale italiano su Game Dev & Indie Games
Speedo
Greenskin
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:17 pm

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by Speedo »

I read that a recent SLC SSD can do as much as 100.000 reads per cell, wich are of course levelled... so that it can work for 5-7 years like normal HDs, and they are improving fast.
Anandtech had a good article about SSD technology sometime last fall... about the time the Intel X25s hit the market. IIRC it said that Intel states their new drives will give a lifetime of 5 years writing 100GB per day. So, for more normal use, the lifespan would be all but comparable to do a normal HDD.
Anywyay i think that things like this expose how much CPU improvement are useless today...
with the same CPU, but exponentially better HD, performances are incredible... Core2+SSD >> i7+HD?
I wouldn't say useless, but yeah I think we've kind of plateaued. My CPU is soon to be 4 years old (Athlon64 4400 dual core) but it can still handle most games and fairly high settings thanks to the gfx card update I did last year (to a 8800GT). The Empire Total War demo was really the first think I've tried that it gets heavily choked up with.

Remember, at least in terms of the average game, the HD is out of the equation once you leave the loading screen. Obviously it makes a big difference when you have constant loading in the background, like in Oblivion/FO3 and many MMOs.
Who could need then to buy a better CPU for everyday use?
They'll bloat up software with more features so that eventually people will need to upgrade. Of course there are some areas like video decoding that require more horsepower. But of course the big factor is that even joe average home user probably isn't likely to keep a desktop more than 5-6 years before replacing it. Laptops are generally replaced much fast than that. So most people will still end up upgrading, even when they don't need it.
jjp
Silver Sponsor
Silver Sponsor
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:55 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Re: Dream SSD machine

Post by jjp »

Enough is never enough.
Post Reply