Ecocho: eco friendly search engine: you search we grow trees

A place for Ogre users to discuss non-Ogre subjects with friends from the community.
Post Reply
User avatar
kickin_bear
Kobold
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:06 pm
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany

Ecocho: eco friendly search engine: you search we grow trees

Post by kickin_bear »

Hi
I just found this:
WEBSITE OF THE DAY - ecocho.com
Search the web, plant some trees. Everybody happy.

Ecocho is the world's first environmentally friendly search engine. Set up by a bunch of green Aussies, it utilises Google and Yahoo technologies to deliver excellent results and for every 1,000 searches, two new trees will be planted.

The economics of it are all a bit beyond me - something to do with retiring carbon foot print credits on a global exchange.
Or something.

But, to be honest, I don't really care how it works, I just think it's a great idea.

Bookmark it now - it'll cost you nothing and deliver the same results you always get.

www.ecocho.com
and I can only agree with the author of this statement.
So let's plant some trees :wink:
User avatar
Kojack
OGRE Moderator
OGRE Moderator
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
x 538

Post by Kojack »

I have an urge to use it to search for chainsaws and videos of those big tree cutting robots. :)
User avatar
syedhs
Silver Sponsor
Silver Sponsor
Posts: 2703
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
x 51

Post by syedhs »

Hmm how are you making sure that they indeed plant the trees as promised? :wink: Or it is just a tongue in the cheek.. :)
A willow deeply scarred, somebody's broken heart
And a washed-out dream
They follow the pattern of the wind, ya' see
Cause they got no place to be
That's why I'm starting with me
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

http://www.ecocho.com/google/index.php
Unfortunately, Google has decided to stop Ecocho from using its search technology.
I guess google isn't so generous after all. :evil:
Creator of QuickGUI!
User avatar
Kojack
OGRE Moderator
OGRE Moderator
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
x 538

Post by Kojack »

http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/google-p ... 15487.html
Furthermore, Ecocho's founder, Tim Macdonald, is also the co-founder of Found Agency, a high-profile search engine optimisation company that has been penalised by Google for breaking its rules in the past.

Google Australia spokesman Rob Shilkin said Ecocho was barred because it broke Google's AdSense policies.

Google's policy is that publishers running Google advertising must not "compensate users for viewing ads or performing searches, or promise compensation to a third party for such behaviour". By promising to plant trees, Ecocho broke those rules.

"The site was in clear violation of our terms of service and we had previously warned the owner of past violations," Shilkin said.
In May last year, Macdonald's company, Found Agency, saw its Google ranking tumble after it was caught unfairly manipulating its search rankings.

At the time, Found's other co-founder, Zak Asani, admitted to the Search Engine Room website that the company liked to test Google's boundaries.

"We've got between 1500 and 2000 websites running at any one time that we use to test the boundaries," he said.
So he's pissed off google in the past by cheating on search rankings and he admits to having 2000 websites trying to get around google's policies. Doesn't sound like the most trustworthy person.
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

Thanks for the information!
Google's policy is that publishers running Google advertising must not "compensate users for viewing ads or performing searches, or promise compensation to a third party for such behaviour". By promising to plant trees, Ecocho broke those rules.
Um.. was Google not aware of this?

It does sound like Tim Macdonald is not trustworthy, but all this information makes Google look stupid. Unless Macdonald proposed to plant trees after working with Google. If this is the case, what was the incentive for Google to pair up with such a person?
Creator of QuickGUI!
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

I found an article which contains similar text as quoted above:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/google-p ... 15487.html

The first sentence really irritates me:
A new Australian green search engine seeking to capitalise on web surfers' eco-guilt has been barred by Google from using its search technology and advertising platform.
I've read a lot of comments related to the news:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/22/ec ... or-google/

The bottom line is that this company is making a commitment to plant trees.

From one of the comments:
I would rather support something which does *something* positive to the environment, than not at all.
I agree. We don't search because we're guilty, we search because we want to help the environment. And yes, I would go out and plant some trees myself, but I'm not sure where I can legally do so, and I haven't made the time to find out this information. :P
Creator of QuickGUI!
User avatar
Kojack
OGRE Moderator
OGRE Moderator
Posts: 7157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
x 538

Post by Kojack »

I found an article which contains similar text as quoted above
Probably because it's the same link as I posted. :)


The other interesting bit from the article:
The benefit of specialist green search engines is questionable because Google itself has invested heavily in green initiatives. Google claims it is carbon neutral, whereas the servers powering sites such as Ecocho are not.
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

haha, oops! :oops:
Creator of QuickGUI!
User avatar
tuan kuranes
OGRE Retired Moderator
OGRE Retired Moderator
Posts: 2653
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Haute Garonne, France
x 4
Contact:

Post by tuan kuranes »

On my left we have Google :

- As said above, Google is carbon neutral:
- Google is already 'green' using its own foundation:
- The work they did on how to power much more efficiently PC. That would saves some energy.
- They follow/push opensource a lot.
- They give away powerful source code and very interesting tech talks
- They're doing GSoc...


On my right, we have he 'eco-businessman':

- Lack of transparency : how much for who ? why not a non-profit ? how much work it really cost to just redirect a page ?
- "Ecocho is owned by Yield Media, which is part of ASX-listed Photon Group"... which has as child company 'Returnity' that does 'email marketing' which I label as 'spammers'.

I would for now choose Google...
warmi
Gnoll
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:56 am
Location: USA

Post by warmi »

Quoting from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/06/ ... -2007.html
purchase carbon offsets for the emissions that we can't reduce directly.
This sounds like the sale and commercialization of indulgences during Dark Ages.

People back then used to pay for their sins (as defined by the Church) to the Church ... these days sins are different and we are dealing with a different kind of religion but the concept is the same.

Welcome back to the dark ages ....
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

Would you rather they didn't do anything about their carbon emissions?

In your example people payed a higher authority (Church), but who is Google paying? The planet? The planet hasn't brought on the idea of paying for our sins, its an effort we put out to resolve a world problem.
Creator of QuickGUI!
warmi
Gnoll
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:56 am
Location: USA

Post by warmi »

Would you rather they didn't do anything about their carbon emissions?
Yeah, well they are not doing anything.

Paying up for their carbon emission does as much to enviroment as paying up to a Church does for your standing with Good.

It is simply way to feel good about yourself.
User avatar
Game_Ender
Ogre Magi
Posts: 1269
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 2:31 am
Location: Rockville, MD, USA

Post by Game_Ender »

warmi wrote:
Would you rather they didn't do anything about their carbon emissions?
Yeah, well they are not doing anything.
That is not true at all. At the very least these services invest in "green" energy companies. So in effect they are providing the seed money for more efficient technologies that will/can be using in the future.
warmi
Gnoll
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:56 am
Location: USA

Post by warmi »

So called growth of efficient green technologies will be dictated by market and market alone.

Unless it becomes profitable to do this stuff, it won't matter how many charitable contributions Google and others offer.

It is just common sense.
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

So called growth of efficient green technologies will be dictated by market and market alone.
You have to ask yourself why there is a growing market for green technologies.
Unless it becomes profitable to do this stuff, it won't matter how many charitable contributions Google and others offer.
More people are starting to care about the environment, and are more willing to support companies that are less pollutant.
Creator of QuickGUI!
User avatar
Game_Ender
Ogre Magi
Posts: 1269
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 2:31 am
Location: Rockville, MD, USA

Post by Game_Ender »

KungFooMasta wrote:More people are starting to care about the environment, and are more willing to support companies that are less pollutant.
Hence being dictated by the makert ;).
User avatar
syedhs
Silver Sponsor
Silver Sponsor
Posts: 2703
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
x 51

Post by syedhs »

I am wary of such offer of 'planting trees per 1000 search' because as I asked earlier, how can you ascertain that the pledge is fulfilled? Or is it just like a light joke that nobody should really pay attention to?

IMO, if you are asking for donation toward better world, you had better be very very transparent because it is better do nothing than devise a plan which is actually wolf in the sheep clothing. Too many crooks and dishonest people nowadays :?
A willow deeply scarred, somebody's broken heart
And a washed-out dream
They follow the pattern of the wind, ya' see
Cause they got no place to be
That's why I'm starting with me
User avatar
Jerky
Orc Shaman
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:13 am
Location: Springville, Utah
Contact:

Post by Jerky »

syedhs wrote:I am wary of such offer of 'planting trees per 1000 search' because as I asked earlier, how can you ascertain that the pledge is fulfilled? Or is it just like a light joke that nobody should really pay attention to?
Let's just assume they are true to the promised statement. They mention nothing about planting these trees in dirt, spaced apart, with any amount of water or sunlight ....

So, what can we conclude? They buy packets of seeds and drop a few in a bucket (aka trashcan) using a computerized dispenser as people do searches through them, thus making them money to buy more seeds. Sounds green to me.
User avatar
KungFooMasta
OGRE Contributor
OGRE Contributor
Posts: 2087
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:11 am
Location: WA, USA
x 16
Contact:

Post by KungFooMasta »

Or you can take two seconds, visit the site, and read the big link on the page that says How we're verified

I know I know, its a lot of work. :wink:
Creator of QuickGUI!
Post Reply